A new take on dimensions
What if we have the concepts of dimensions wrong? What if we’re looking at it backwards?
Nassim Haramein, an accomplished physicist, helped me see the fallacy of dimensions. See, we believe that we live in three dimensions, but the more I learn about it, the more I see that’s actually impossible.
In Nassim’s explanation, when he first learned about dimensions, his teacher told him “it all starts with a point, but that point is imaginary”. Then we have two points which form a line, or the first dimension, then three points which form a plane, or the second dimension, then a fourth point which gives depth, or the third dimension. Nassim’s problem with this is that if each of the points is imaginary, then how can it construct things that aren’t imaginary?
And I take Nassim’s question one step further and ask this:
Most physicists contend that we live in a three dimensional world, and that the fourth dimension is “time” or “duration”. This is because duration is the aspect of dimensions that enables things to move or change. By that logic, we must live at least in the fourth dimension, because if we didn’t have duration, nothing would be able to move. If all we knew was length, width, and depth but not duration, everything would be impossibly rigid, just as anything that exists in the second dimension must be impossibly flat.
Also, if Nassim is correct, then it’s all imaginary anyhow so nothing should exits in an impossibly rigid three dimensional world.
Yet, here we are.
Well, there’s another theory of dimensions that makes way more sense, and it’s this: we actually live somewhere between the 10th and the 14th dimension. There are some videos that explain this in depth and I’ll link them below. Essentially, the argument is that the 10th dimension is the culmination of all the infinite probabilities of all the infinite possibilities expanding in every infinite direction, and so…becomes a point. Then if you add one, two, and three more of these infinite probability points, you may get something that looks like a three dimensional world, and if you add another dimension, for 14, you’ll have a set of dimensions that can move and be manipulated but appears to have length, width, depth and duration.
Now, according to the holographic universe model, and the work of Donal Hoffman and Tom Campbell, we know with almost 100% certainty, that the reality we perceive isn’t the reality that exists. Our job, as contractors with the universe, is to carve that reality space down to a single thread of existence.
It works like this:
All of existence is constructed of infinite sets of infinite sets of infinite probabilities. So, when you are born on earth, countless probability sets go away because you are now here. Let’s say you are born female, in the year 1982, to loving but alcoholic parents, in a small town in Newfoundland in Canada. Once you arrive, all those other probabilities go away. Like, you can not longer be a male, you can no longer be born in 1953 or any other year, you now have Canadian lineage and so on. What you now have to work with is a more manageable “finite” set of infinite probabilities. From that birth point, you can launch and become a store clerk, astronaut, physician, drug addict, and any variety of life lines based on your combination of nature, nurture and disposition.
The magical part is that with each move down your lifeline, with each decision you make, or decision made for you, you carve away another set of infinite probabilities. Let’s say you decide to be a veterinarian. That cuts off almost all probability of you becoming an accountant or an insurance adjuster.
The real magic, once the idea sinks in, is that this view of dimensions and reality gives us full autonomy over the future of our lives, once we accept the reality of who we are in any given moment. It gives us the ability to interact with and influence the infinite fractals and possibilities that unfold for us with each moment that hurdle forward through spacetime, quite literally carving out the reality we desire for ourselves.
Comments
Post a Comment